Ludicrous’ fixture issue that must be fixed; two MOTY stunners to test panel — AFLW Talking Pts

 

From the outset, the headline grabber is clear: “Ludicrous’ fixture issue that must be fixed; two MOTY stunners to test panel — AFLW Talking Pts”. It’s not just catchy—it really points to the heart of the matter in the AFLW 2025 season. With the competition gaining traction, momentum and excitement, it’s also hitting a frustrating snag: the scheduling simply doesn’t line up. Meanwhile, on-field brilliance is flourishing — two genuine Mark-of-the-Year (MOTY) stunners emerged recently, and the panel’s decision will not be easy. That dual narrative captures both the highs and the unfinished business in AFLW. 

The “ludicrous’ fixture issue that must be fixed; two MOTY stunners to test panel — AFLW Talking Pts” topic demands attention because scheduling matters. When the league’s said to start early August with a grand final scheduled for late November, club officials, players and media raise the question: is this the right timeframe? According to one commentator, “the grand final to sit in the final week of November again … that’s ludicrous.” The issue isn’t simply convenience: it’s fatigue, overlapping seasons, state competitions and audience engagement all colliding. So yes — the fixture issue that must be fixed is very real.

Yet while fixture problems dominate headlines, the on-field product in AFLW is thriving. The “ludicrous’ fixture issue that must be fixed; two MOTY stunners to test panel — AFLW Talking Pts” storyline gives equal weight to the spectacle of elite women’s football. In one match, two jaw-dropping grabs emerged: one by Sarah Hosking showing brave ball‐back courage, and another by Ruby Schleicher soaring above two opponents. The panel now faces a serious tough call for the MOTY. That’s the good news for fans—elite moments emerging despite structural issues.

Dig a little deeper and you’ll see why the fixture issue cannot be dismissed. The “ludicrous’ fixture issue that must be fixed; two MOTY stunners to test panel — AFLW Talking Pts” tropes coincide because the scheduling clash inevitably impacts performance, crowd numbers and the league’s momentum. As one broadcast voice said, “we’ve had 4,000 (on Sunday) … the highest in five years” yet the grand final timing clashes with other major sports. If AFLW is going to ride the wave of its explosive growth, it needs a fixture structure that supports it—not limits it.

Still, the “ludicrous’ fixture issue that must be fixed; two MOTY stunners to test panel — AFLW Talking Pts” framing also underscores the duality: while the engine room of sport (the players, the brilliance, the community) is firing, the logistics around it are letting things slip. Imagine high-adrenaline matches, but fans tuning out because the timing is awkward. Imagine players peaking, but fitness and state-league pathways suffering because of the calendar pressure. The league would benefit from aligning more closely with the men’s season or locking in double-headers, as some have suggested.

In conclusion, the phrase “ludicrous’ fixture issue that must be fixed; two MOTY stunners to test panel — AFLW Talking Pts” isn’t just sensational—it summarises a pivotal moment for AFLW. With two unforgettable marks that will fuel highlight reels for years, and a scheduling quagmire that threatens to undermine momentum, the league stands at a crossroads. If the fixture issue that must be fixed is met with decisive action, and the platform for those MOTY stunners is consistently available, the future is incredibly bright. For now, we’ll watch, we’ll cheer and we’ll hope the decision-makers recognise that the spotlight is already on them.